Commodore Simonson, Reveal Thyself

I’m on a quest to sort out all of my ancestors named Abraham Simonson (there are ten). Once I figure out Abraham, I’ll work on the Isaacs (11) Elizabeths (15) and Johns (22). It would help if they were in different lines of work, but no. Mariners all, it seems – or mostly.

Our current person of interest is Commodore Abraham Simonson, king of shad fishing. The goal is to figure out who his parents were, or his wife, or his children, so I can see where he fits.

Commodore Simonson

New York American, Saturday March 24, 1838

The old Commodore was in the newspapers all the time for his legendary shad fishing expertise, but none of the articles are helpful in pinning him down. Here’s a few more:

Kate's Lighthouse, Robins Reef

Kate’s Lighthouse, Robins Reef (Photo credit: animaltourism.com)

“Commodore Abraham Simonson a citizen of Middletown caught four fine shad on Saturday evening at Robins Reef being the first taken in our bay this season” – Richmond County Gazette, Wednesday, March 26th 1862

“The first shad of the season was caught by Messrs Simonson & Co in their nets at Robins Reef on the 27th of March” – Richmond County Gazette, April 1st 1868

You know he was something of a celebrity, because he was even the subject of some snark:

“We came …to Springfield [Connecticut] where we supped and found a cleanly and sumptuous entertainment for the night. Here we feasted on Connecticut River shad just out of the pot, of super excellent flavor and fatness far superior to the first trophies of the season caught by Commodore Simonson yearly in New York bay and served up on an Astor House platter.  – F.W.S., The Knickerbocker; Or, New-York Monthly Magazine, Volume 45

Sounds like someone was jealous she didn’t get invited to Astor House.

Finally, there was this:

“Commodore Abram SIMONSON, an old and respected inhabitant of Richmond county, died at his home in Van Duzer street, Stapleton, on Monday evening, in the seventy-eighth year of his age. He had been for nearly sixty years engaged in the Staten Island shad fisheries and was the head of the well known firm of SIMONSON & Co., fishermen”. – Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, January 5 1877

That’s Rochester, as in New York, so either he was a shad fish god or it was an extremely slow news day.

After he passed on, his firm kept going, though apparently not quite so successfully:

Smack and VanDuzer

New York Times, April 12, 1880

Our phone lines are open and we are desperate to know:

Parents, siblings, children’s names?

And while we’re at it: what is a gilt-net? And are shad really better in Connecticut?

Advertisements

In Over Her Head

Bicycle Skirt image

Clarissa Dockham’s Patented Bicycle Skirt

Since March is Women’s History Month, let’s take a spin backwards in time to see what Staten Island women were up to in, say, 1895.

One industrious Staten Island woman seems to have been very taken with the latest craze: bicycles. Before the 1890’s, bicycle technology wasn’t very advanced, so they were sort of a novelty item. But then vast improvements in design made them sufficiently comfortable and safe for everyone to ride them – particularly and importantly, women. Before this, bicycles had belonged to that class of things that were reserved for men, like football, and cigars, and balancing the checking account.

Then instantly, bicycles became widely, hugely, insanely popular in America, like no-doc mortgages in the 2000s, but with a happier ending. Excitement was palpable. Vast sums were spent. In Dayton, Ohio, Orville and Wilbur Wright were churning them out endlessly. Bicycle societies sprang up everywhere. There was fevered speculation that one day, children would even ride bicycles to school.

The first bicycles on Staten Island were sold from Nicholas Bennett’s general store near Fort Wadsworth in 1896, and today, Bennett’s Bicycles is still in business on Jewett Avenue, where the fifth generation of Bennetts still run the oldest bike shop in New York City.

But back to our industrious woman. In a time when women did not have the right to vote, the suddenly accessible bicycle was a revelation, and an amazingly important factor in the nascent women’s suffrage movement. Bicycles got women out of the house and gave them a sense of mobility and autonomy they’d never known. No less a personage than Susan B. Anthony herself said,

Let me tell you what I think of bicycling. I think it has done more to emancipate women than anything else in the world. It gives women a feeling of freedom and self-reliance. I stand and rejoice every time I see a woman ride by on a wheel…the picture of free, untrammeled womanhood.

Yeah, that was awesome. Except for the part with the billowing skirts and corsets. Here enters our heroine, Mrs. Clarissa Ellen Dockham, of Tompkinsville, Staten Island, who on Jul 23, 1895 applied for U.S. Patent #556881 for the Bicycle Skirt. “My invention…has for its object to produce a combination garment which may be adjusted for convenient use when bicycling or which may be worn for ordinary street use.” Clarissa had figured out how a woman could, at will, transform her floor-length skirt into “bicycle-bloomers” and then back again, by means of a “forked or bifurcated skirt-lifter.”

No, don’t go there… Clarissa was spot on with the Rational Dress Society, which objected to:

fashion…that either deforms the figure, impedes the movement of the body, or in any way tends to injure the health. It protests against the wearing of tightly fitted corsets, of high-heeled or narrow toed boots and shoes; of heavily weighted skirts, as rendering healthy exercise almost impossible.

Yes. Now if we could just do something about Spanx. But I digress.

You would not think it so, but the increased mobility and the freedom and the bloomers turned out be positively scandalous and caused a whole heap of trouble in some quarters. There was great consternation that upon a bicycle, a woman could injure certain fair body parts, to her ultimate ruin. It was felt that the Orderly Domesticity of The Home would be greatly insulted if women could roam the streets at will, and that without a watchful husband nearby, females might fall prey to a lessening of their morals, thus bringing about the fall of civilization.

They did not yet have cable.

Perhaps Mr. Dockham was embarrassed and put his foot down, or maybe Clarissa was just too out there even for other women. Because the following year she filed another patent application. This one was a riff on the previous design, and it did away with the “skirt-lifters,” combining a skirt with built-in “drawers” in one adjustable garment.

“It will be evident,” Clarissa wrote, “that the skirt may be put on over the head and the drawers afterward buttoned, and it being remembered that women are averse to garments which do not go on over the head, the advantage of a trousers garment which can be put on over the head becomes at once apparent.”

The government of the United States agreed, and granted her Patent #568339.

I’ll just let that sink in for a minute.

Sad to say that’s all I know, except that the New York Daily Tribune reported on February 19, 1907, that “a dwelling house, No. 34 Central in Tompkinsville, formerly the property of the late Mrs.Clarissa Dockham, has been sold under foreclosure proceedings.” It had been a boarding house for some time, and was purchased by Otto W. Thomen of Grymes Hill for $16,500.

Let’s hope Clarissa had a great ride.